Anyone else seeing AVAz rotation flag thin barriers that curvature and coherence underplay? On a 2019 3D over the Wolfcamp B in Reeves County (25 m bins), azimuthal AVO indicates stress partitioning across a subtle relay ramp; I’m trying to gauge how much weight to give that when mapping barrier continuity ahead of completions — what attributes are you trusting lately?
I give the AVAz “rotation” weight only where its fast-axis lines up with FMI/breakout azimuth and holds up on limited-azimuth stacks — do two 90° stacks and check the differential AVO for footprint. If it flips across your “relay ramp” and coincides with a bump in stage DFIT ISIP, I’ll map it as a thin barrier even when curvature is quiet. Have you tried ant-tracking on a scale-limited curvature volume to trace continuity, or am I letting AVAz be my divining rod again?